Finance
Code Chapter 1 - Financial Organization Historical Background
Evolution
of Financial Organisation: 1903 Year - Before Railway Board (1905)
· 41000 Route KMs - 33 separate Railway
companies (4 - Government, 5 - erstwhile Indian States and 24 - Private)
· Regulator - Railway
Branch of PWD - Public Works Department of Government of
India - Headed by ICS Officer (Indian Civil Service) who is also a Member
of Viceroy and Governor General’s Executive Council.
·
Assisted by One Secretary (Like CRB),
Three Deputy Secretaries & Four Assistant Secretaries
· 3 Deputy Secretaries (like Railway Board
Members) representing Traffic, Accounts & Construction.
· Entire Railway System divided into 7
Circles (like Zonal Railways at present)
· Each Circle headed by Consulting Engineer
(like GM) and Government Examiner of Accounts (like PFA)
· The Accounting and Auditing functions of
the Railway Branch - combined with the Accountant General, Public Works
Department.
Thomas
Robertson Report
· 1901 - Thomas Robertson, CVO
was appointed as Special Commissioner for Indian Railways -
to prepare a Report on the administration & working of Indian
Railways.
·
In his report, he recommended setting up
of a Railway Board consisting of a President / Chief Commissioner and 2
Commissioners, who are having a practical knowledge of Railway matters and
should be “Men of high Railway standing”
·
The Board should be assisted by a
Secretary, a Chief Inspector of Railways and other Inspectors & Government
Auditors.
Railway Board
· Established in 1905, 18.02.1905
· On the recommendations of the report of Sir
Thomas Robertsons committee in the place of abolished Railway Branch
of PWD
· Initially Chairman and Two Members
· Responsible for the Government of India in
the Department of Commerce & Industry.
· The Railway Department was established
in the year 1908 based on the recommendations of the Railway Finance
Committee.
· Accountant General of Railways was created
(due to amalgamation of the Accounts and Civil Audit establishments of
PWD)
· Landmark Development : Appointment
of FC - Financial Commissioner for Railways in April, 1923 ( on the
recommendations of Acworth Committee (1921)
· Objects of appointment of FC are
· i) The economy in the expenditure of
public moneys
· ii) Co-ordination of Railway Policy with
General Financial policy of Government of India.
Separation
Convention:
· Acworth Committee recommended Separation
of Railway finances from the General finances of Government of India
· Excerpts of the Acworth Committee
are:
"We
recommend that the Finance Department should cease to control
the internal finances of the railway, that the railways should have a separate
budget of their own, be responsible for
earning and expending their own incomes and for providing
such net revenue as is required to meet the interest on the debt incurred
or to be incurred by the Government for railway purpose; and that the railway
budget should be presented to the Legislative Assembly, not by the Finance
Member of the Council but by the Member in charge of Railways",
Salient
features of Acworth committee recommendations are:
1.
No role of Finance Department in regards
with Railway Finances
2.
Separation of Railway Budget from General
Budget
3.
Railways were responsible for earnings and
expending their own incomes
4.
Obligation of paying of Interest on the
Debt (i.e., Dividends) to General Finances (Ministry of Finance)
5.
Presenting of Railway Budget by the
Member, in charge of Railways/Minister of Railways (not by Finance Member / Finance
Minister)
· However such recommendation is
inconsistent with the provisions of Government of India Act, 1919
· So an alternate choice was a Convention to
be laid before the Legislative Assembly in the form of Resolution. The
Legislative Assembly voted on the Convention resolution of 1924 on
20.09.1924.
· Separation of Railway Budget from General
Budget - 1924 year
Merger
of Railway Budget with the General Budget
· With effect from 2017-18 FY
· Estimates of Ministry of Railways have
been included in the estimates of Union Budget
· Presented by Ministry of
Finance
· Single Appropriation Bill under Article
114 (1) of the Constitution of India.
Evolvement of Financial Organisation - 5 Stages:
First
Stage: Prior to the appointment of FC
·
Prior to the appointment of FC - Financial
Commissioner for Railways. In this stage, Accounting work was done by the AG -
Accountant General, Railways, under the administrative control of the Auditor
General (like Present C&AG - Comptroller & Auditor General of
India)
Second
Stage: Appointment of FC. Separate cadre of IRAS
·
Appointment of FC - Financial Commissioner
of Railways in 1923 (April)
Third
Stage: Separation of Accounting & Auditing functions
·
Separation of the Accounting &
Auditing functions on the Railways in the year 1929
·
on the recommendations of Report
of Sir Arthur Lowes Dicknson, 1927 (August)
·
The Accountant General, Railways (then
under the administrative control of the Auditor General) was replaced
by
·
Controller of Railway Accounts (present
PFA) responsible to the FC
·
The Director of Railway Audit (present PDA
- Principal Director of Audit) was under the Auditor General (present
C&AG)
·
At Unit level - Accounts Officers
answerable to PFA and Audit Officer answerable to PDA
·
Beginning of IRAS - Indian Railway
Accounts Service as a cadre distinct from the IA&AS - Indian Audit &
Accounts Service.
Fourth
Stage: Railway Accounts under the control of GM
·
Placing the Railway Accounts Department
under the administrative control of GM instead of FC.
·
on the recommendations of Indian
Railway Enquiry Committee, 1937 (commonly known as Wedgwood Committee) on
the pattern of British Railway practice.
·
To ensure full contact an adequate
co-ordination between the GM and PFA
·
Subject to the condition, that PFA would
have access to the FC / Member Finance in all important matters on which he
might be in disagreement with the GM not only as regards accounting regularity
but also on questions of financial prudence.
·
Experiment in two State Railways i.e., NWR
- North Western Railway and GIPR - Great Indian Peninsular Railway in
1938. Later it was made permanent in all Government Railways in
1941.
Fifth
Stage: Setting up of distinct Finance Branch under PFA
·
Setting up of a distinct Finance Branch
under PFA for placing at the disposal of the GM
·
An improved machinery for financial advice
and control.
·
Experimental measure in B.B & C.I
Railway in 1947 and later adopted permanently on all Indian Railways.
Summary:
·
The Railway Ministry has been fully
delegated with powers relating to all Railway matters.
·
The Railway Ministry is managed entirely
by Railway Men
·
The Railways have their own independent
and integrated financial set up i.e., having full powers of financial sanction
to expenditure and Accounts are maintained by the Railway’s own Accounting
cadres and not by the C&AG - Comptroller & Auditor General.
Member Finance
·
Professional Head of the Railway Financial
Organisation.
·
Represents the Government of India,
Finance Department on the Railway Board as ex-officio Secretary to the
Government of India in the Ministry of Railways in Financial
matters.
·
Vested with full powers of the Government
of India to sanction Railway Expenditure subject to the General control of the
Finance Minister.
·
In the event of a difference of opinion
between the Member Finance and other Members of Railway Board, the former, has
the right to refer the matter to the Finance Minister. This stipulation is
equally applicable to the difference between PFA and other PHODs or GM.
·
May issue instructions to the PFAs, on all
accounting and administrative matters. These instructions will be
communicated to the GM and it is the duty of PFA, to give effect to them. The
PFA should, however, keep the GMs in touch with such correspondence as may be
exchanged by him directly with Member Finance
Finance Branch:
· Under control of PFA
· To assist the Railway Administration in
considering all proposals involving financial implications as Canons of
Financial Propriety.
· In any other business, there is hardly any
activity or service which does not involve considerations of finance in some
form or the other. Railways is not an exclusion.
· An important limb of the
Administration
· Its functions are broadly analogous
to those of Management Accountant like:
1.
Assist Management
2.
Making rational plans and
decisions.
3.
Controlling the operations of the Railway
Administration as a whole.
·
Role has been changed from a mere “friendly
critic to one of the Complete “Management Participation”
·
This role is in no way abated by the
fact that in case of disagreement, when he has been overruled by the GM, the
PFA may request the GM to make a reference to the Railway Board for orders, and
the GM would be under an obligation to make such a reference incorporating
therein fairly and fully the comments and views of the PFA.
·
The success of the Finance Branch
would depend on the spirit and the manner in which its services are utilized by
the Executive Departments.
·
The relations between the latter and the
Finance Branch should, like all interdepartmental relations, be based on mutual
confidence and free and full consultation.
Budget:
·
Initial preparation of the Budget is the
responsibility of the Departmental Officers (Executives)
·
Whereas the scrutiny and compilation of
the Budget as a whole - the responsibility of PFA. Also the setting up of a
satisfactory system of Budgetary Control.
·
The Budget Branch is under the control of
the GM, though it is manned by personnel of Accounts personnel & Other
Departments.
·
It is obligatory on the Railway
Administration i.e., GM to furnish to the Railway Board a
verbatim copy of the opinion expressed by PFA with every such proposal,
unless it has his unqualified concurrence in which
case the fact that he has concurred in the proposal should be indicated in the
letter addressed to the Railway Board.
·
The PFA’s appreciation of the proposal
accompanying the Administration's letter should be sufficiently comprehensive
and should not only contain his comments, if any, on the facts adduced in
justification of the proposal but should also mention its financial and
budgetary implications and his views as to its financial prudence.
·
There can be no hard and fast rules on
how precisely the financial scrutiny of proposals received
from the Executive departments should be carried out.
·
Objective: To secure maximum efficiency in
Railway operations at the minimum cost, without unduly sacrificing one for the
other.
·
The functions of Railway Finance Officers
have now developed beyond the traditional bounds of those of the financial
Accountants.
·
These are no longer restricted to
tendering advice to the Administration whenever required or necessary in all
matters involving railway finances.
·
The Finance Officer's job as a
Management Accountant is:
1.
To furnish and interpret financial
statements
2.
Compile cost data and prepare cost reports
3.
Explore avenues of controlling staff and
material costs, institute and operate budgetary control procedures, and
participate in all Capital expenditure and rating/pricing decisions duly
employing tools of analyzing financial decisions such as IRR, Sensitivity
Analysis etc.
·
This involves an irrevocable commitment to
Management, and calls for a high degree of professional training and
competence.
·
At the same time the Finance Officer
should see that the standards of financial propriety, expected of all Public
Servants in the operation of public funds, are strictly observed.
Standards / canons of financial propriety
Para
No. 116 of Finance Code -
Rule
No. 21 of GFR ( General Financial Rules) of Dept. of Expenditure, Ministry of
Finance, Govt. of India.Ø
All
sanctioning authorities must pay due regard these rules/principles while
exercising their financial powers. There is a misnomer, that these are
the norms to be followed by financial authorities (Finance officers). But
it is not correct. All Executives/Officers as sanctioning authorities are
conscious of these standards.Ø
Every
Officer should also enforce financial order and strict economy at every step
and see that all relevant financial rules and regulations are observed, by his
own office and by subordinate disbursing officers.Ø
KEYWORD
– P V A C A
1. The expenditure should not prima facie
be more than the occasion demands.
(prima
facie means 'at first appearance' or 'before investigation'. A proposal for
purchase of a chair for officers at a cost of Rs.one lakh need not require much
investigation to sanction the same. That means on the face itself i.e.,
cost of the chair Rs. one lakh is not justified to incur expenditure.)
2. That every Government servant should
exercise' the same vigilance
in respect of expenditure incurred from public moneys as a person of ordinary prudence
would exercise in respect of the expenditure of his own money.
(As
an ordinary person, how much exercise we would be taken for purchase of
Computer or Plasma Color Television, the same exercise supposed to be applied
also for expenditure involved of public money)
3. No authority should exercise its powers
of sanctioning expenditure to pass an order which will be directly or
indirectly to its own advantage.
(Sanctioning
of expenditure would not be advantageous to the sanctioning authorities
directly or indirectly. That means Officer should not decide the
specifications of the items to be purchased to suit the particular firm for
which he or his relatives have a stake)
4. Public moneys should not be utilized for
the benefit of a particular person or section of the community unless-
a. the amount of expenditure involved is
insignificant ; or
b. a claim for the amount could be
enforced in a court of law ; or
c. the expenditure is in pursuance of a
recognized policy or custom.
5. The amount of allowances, such as traveling
allowances, granted to meet expenditure of a particular type, should be so
regulated that the allowances are not on the whole sources of profit to the
recipients.
(People should not think of the allowances
such as Travelling allowance, Over time allowance, etc as profit. It
should not be correct )
Audit officers shall also be responsible for
watching that the above principles are strictly observed or not.
Key Takeaways for MCQ
1.
Before 1905, Railways under the control of
PWD - Public Works Department
2.
Railway Board formed in the year 1905
under Ministry of Commerce & Industries
3.
Railway Board formed on the
recommendations of Sir Robert Thomson Committee
4.
Railway Department established in the Year
1908. (Before that, Railways under the Ministry of Commerce &
Industries)
5.
FC - Financial Commissioner (now Member
Finance) appointment in the year 1923 - on the recommendations of Sir Acworth
Committee.
6.
Separation of the Railway Budget from the
General Budget - in the year 1924 - based on the recommendations of Sir Acworth
Committee
7.
The merger of the Railway Budget with the
General Budget in the Financial year 2017-18
8.
The financial organisation brought under
the GM - Based on the recommendations of the Indian Railway Enquiry Committee,
1937 (commonly known as the Wedgwood Committee)
9.
The designation of CAO-Chief Accounts
Officer was redesigned as the FA&CAO - Financial Advisor & Chief
Accounts Officer.
10.
Separating the Accounting and Auditing
Functions - 1929 - on the recommendations of Report of Sir Arthur Lowes
Dicknson
11.
Placing the Railway Accounts Department
under the administrative control of GM instead of FC - on the recommendations
of Indian Railway Enquiry Committee, 1937 (commonly known as Wedgwood
Committee).
12.
Prior to 1937 year - CAO - Chief
Accounts Officer - under the administrative control of FC.
13.
1937 year onwards - CAO - Chief Accounts
Officer - under the administrative control of GM.
14.
1947 - Setting up of a distinct Finance
Branch under PFA for placing at the disposal of the GM
15.
Canons of Financial Proprity - Para
No. 116 of Finance Code Volume One
16.
Canons of Financial Proprity - Rule 21 of
GFR
17.
Canons of Financial Proprity -
KEYWORD – P V A C A ( P Stands for Prima
facie, V stands for Vigilance, A stands for Advantageous C stands
for Community & A stands for Allowance.
18.
Audit officers shall also be responsible
for watching that the canons of financial priority are strictly observed or
not.
Previous |
Now |
Railway Branch |
Railway Board |
Public Works Dept |
Railway Dept |
Secretary, Railway Branch |
Chairman & CEO, Railway Board |
Dy.Secretary – Accounts |
Member (Finance) - MF |
Dy. Secretary – Traffic |
Member (O&BD - Operations & Business
Development) - M/O&BD |
Dy. Secretary – Construction |
Surrendered now. (Previously it was Member -
Engineering) |
Circle |
Zonal Railway |
Consulting Engineer |
General Manager |
Govt Examiner of Accounts |
PFA – Principal Financial Advisor |
Event |
Year |
Committee (recommended by) |
Railway Board established |
1905 |
Sir Thomson Robertson Committee |
Railway Department established |
1908 |
Railway Finance Committee |
FC - Financial Commissioner appointment |
1923 |
Sir Acworth Committee |
Separation of Railway finances from General Finances or Railway Budget from General Budget |
1924 |
Sir Acworth Committee |
Separation of Accounts & Audit Functions in IR |
1929 |
Sir Arthur Lowes Dicknson |
Brought Railway Accounts under the control of GM (instead of FC) |
1941 |
Indian Railway Enquiry Committee (commonly known as Wedgewood Committee) |
Merger of Railway Budget with General Budget |
2017-18 |
NITI Aayog recommendations |
MCQ on First chapter of Finance Code - Financial Organization -
Historical Background
SN |
Question |
Answer |
1 |
Railway Board was formed in the year ______ on the recommendations of _______ A.
1903, Railway
Finance Committee B.
1903, Sir
Thomson Robertson Committee C.
1905, Railway
Finance Committee D.
1905, Sir
Thomson Robertson Committee |
|
2 |
FC - Financial Commissioner (Present Member Finance)- First appointed in the year _____ on the recommendations of _____________ A.
1923, Sir
Acworth Committee B.
1923, Sir
Thomas Robertson Committee C.
1924, Sir
Acworth Committee D. 1924, Sir Thomas Robertson Committee |
|
3 |
Separating the Audit and Accounts functions in Indian Railways in the year ______ on the recommendations of _____________ A.
1924, Sir
Acworth Committee B.
1929, Sir
Arthur Lowes Dicknson’s Report C.
1923, Sir
Acworth Committee D.
1924, Sir
Arthur Lowes Dicknson’s Report |
|
4 |
Canons of Financial Propriety - Para _____ of ________ A.
116 of Accounts
Code B.
116 of Finance
Code C.
126 of Accounts
Code D.
126 of Finance
Code |
|
5 |
Indian Railways were under the control of _________Departments from 1903 to till now (as per chronological order) A.
PWD, Transport
and Railways B.
Commerce &
Industries, PWD and Railways C.
PWD, Commerce
& Industries and Railways D.
Commerce &
Industries and Railways |
|
6 |
Placing of Railway Accounts Department under the administrative control of GM instead of FC - on the recommendations of _________ A.
Indian Railways
Enquiry Committee (Wedgewood Committee) B.
Railway Finance
Committee C.
Sir Thomas
Robertson Committee D.
Sir Arthur
Lowes Dicknson |
|
7 |
Merger of Railway Budget with the General Budget takes place in the year _____ A.
2018-19 B.
2017-18 C.
2020-21 D.
2016-17 |
|
8 |
The designations of Accounts Officer in IR are _________ (chronological order) A.
Financial
Advisor, Chief Accounts Officer, FA&CAO and PFA B.
Chief Accounts
Officer, Financial Advisor, FA&CA and PFA C.
Chief Accounts
Officer, FA&CAO and PFA D.
FA&CAO and
PFA |
|
9 |
Setting up of a distinct Finance Branch under FA&CAO (present PFA) for placing at the disposal of GM in the year _____ A.
1924 B.
1929 C.
1941 D.
1947 |
|
10 |
Before 1905, entire Indian Railways was divided into 7 _____ A.
Zones B.
Sections C.
Sectors D.
Circles |
Answers for MCQ on
First chapter of Finance Code - Financial Organization -
Historical Background
SN |
Question |
Answer |
1 |
Railway Board was formed in the year ______ on the recommendations of _______ A. 1903, Railway Finance Committee B. 1903, Sir Thomson Robertson Committee C. 1905, Railway Finance Committee D. 1905, Sir Thomson Robertson Committee |
D |
2 |
FC - Financial Commissioner (Present Member Finance)- First appointed in the year _____ on the recommendations of _____________ A. 1923, Sir Acworth Committee B. 1923, Sir Thomas Robertson Committee C. 1924, Sir Acworth Committee D. 1924, Sir Thomas Robertson Committee |
A |
3 |
Separating the Audit and Accounts functions in Indian Railways in the year ______ on the recommendations of _____________ A. 1924, Sir Acworth Committee B. 1929, Sir Arthur Lowes Dicknson’s Report C. 1923, Sir Acworth Committee D. 1924, Sir Arthur Lowes Dicknson’s Report |
B |
4 |
Canons of Financial Propriety - Para _____ of ________ A.
116 of Accounts
Code B.
116 of Finance
Code C.
126 of Accounts
Code D.
126 of Finance
Code |
B |
5 |
Indian Railways were under the control of _________Departments from 1903 to till now (as per chronological order) A. PWD, Transport and Railways B. Commerce & Industries, PWD and Railways C. PWD, Commerce & Industries and Railways D. Commerce & Industries and Railways |
C |
6 |
Placing of Railway Accounts Department under the administrative control of GM instead of FC - on the recommendations of _________ A. Indian Railways Enquiry Committee (Wedgewood
Committee) B. Railway Finance Committee C. Sir Thomas Robertson Committee D. Sir Arthur Lowes Dicknson |
A |
7 |
Merger of Railway Budget with the General Budget takes place in the year _____ A. 2018-19 B. 2017-18 C. 2020-21 D. 2016-17 |
B |
8 |
The designations of Accounts Officer in IR are _________ (chronological order) A. Financial Advisor, Chief Accounts Officer,
FA&CAO and PFA B. Chief Accounts Officer, Financial Advisor, FA&CA
and PFA C. Chief Accounts Officer, FA&CAO and PFA D. FA&CAO and PFA |
C |
9 |
Setting up of a distinct Finance Branch under FA&CAO (present PFA) for placing at the disposal of GM in the year _____ A. 1924 B. 1929 C. 1941 D. 1947 |
D |
10 |
Before 1905, entire Indian Railways was divided into 7 _____ A. Zones B. Sections C. Sectors D. Circles |
D |
No comments:
Post a Comment