Benchmark for promotion to administrative grades in Railway Services.
No.2017/SCC/03/09
New Delhi, Dated : 16.04.2018
| Grade | Benchmark as per instructions dated 15.12.15 | Interpretation of benchmark consequent to introduction of APARs with numerical grading |
| HAG | Very Good Plus — two ‘Outstanding’ and three ‘Very Good’ grading in the last five years. However, minimum ‘Very Good’ in each of the last five APARs | Bench mark will continue to be ‘Very Good plus’ i.e. minimum two ‘Outstanding’ and three ‘Very Good’ grading or equivalent in the last five APARs under consideration classifying the numerical grading in terms of ‘Outstanding’, ‘Very Good’ and ‘Good’ as per Board’s instructions dated 21.07.17. A minimum grading of ‘Very Good’ is also required in each of the five APARs. |
| SAG and NFSG | Very Good — The minimum performance benchmark will be ‘Very Good’ in each of the last five APARs. | Bench mark will continue to be Very Good i.e. minimum grading of ‘Very Good’ in each of the last five APARs under consideration classifying the numerical grading in terms of ‘Outstanding’, ‘Very Good’ and ‘Good’ as per Board’s instructions dated 21.07.17. |
| JAG | Good — should have earned two ‘Very Good’ and three ‘Good’ grading or equivalent in the last five APARs | Bench mark will be ‘Good plus’ which will be defined as two ‘Very Good’ and three ‘Good’ APARs in the last five APARs under consideration classifying the numerical grading in terms of ‘Outstanding’, ‘Very Good’ and ‘Good’ as per Board’s instructions dated 21.07.17. A minimum grading of ‘Good’ is also required in each of the five APARs, |
2. DPC should not be guided merely by the overall grading, that may be
recorded in the APARs but should make its own assessment on the basis of
entries in the APARs, as at times the overall grading in a APAR may be
inconsistent with the grading under various parameters or attributes.
recorded in the APARs but should make its own assessment on the basis of
entries in the APARs, as at times the overall grading in a APAR may be
inconsistent with the grading under various parameters or attributes.
2017/SCC/03/09/Pt(I) dtd 01.09.2017
& 16.04.2018
HAG = VG plus minimum 39
SAG & NFSG = VG minimum 35
JAG = Good minimum 29
2017/SCC/03/09 dtd 23.11.2017
Outstanding = 9
Very Good = 7
Good = 5
Average/Below Average =0
No comments:
Post a Comment